why2 reasons
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GDKNDGFPY4TQEEDHYWFQZ52ZCIFMQCOC5AOQ74OPK63YXLX76L7WVQP3, which is not in the allowlist
counterpartycounterparty_denied
GDKNDGFPY4TQEEDHYWFQZ52ZCIFMQCOC5AOQ74OPK63YXLX76L7WVQP3 is on the screening list: you placed this account on the screening list for this run
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 6dc3b8feaf9900631024a03381817019c9e095952b83a5e9ad6c799097558538
- request
- 7dc82155f7b032e3535aabe73bbe6f645711a7d8373b7ff3ac57f2acda431136
- transaction
- f540b23a4c9d9203add2f0e09a6db88a6f01b66b5bea0d1fc1b54a479359dd8fcomputed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 23257
the chainentry 23257
- sealed to the entry before
- df8a0a02faea6035381dec8cb44d59b715b668f59f7a030f8293f59768bdd6ee
- this leaf
- d55e15c81d677e28784a8cbd3fbc745cb4032e9f1d8c111cae1324242f14452f
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- iOwbjX+I3K3V5FDTQikRfv/rDLWOXe2PgxvbrKxoY1K8+xCpdXuLcNBTIQ8BGBAKADoK08jvALGc5LlGujkBAg==