why1 reason
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GD4YDDBILMPNRTH3O5WPXT6UFSDGKH5322SQXSJ5CY6SE6PMW7RMA4NK, which is not in the allowlist
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 1fcefb40eaea0aba7526a5826466da292481e6407d5ddf560784713360ae9bc2
- request
- 7e79ee732b2dbdec68a6e176dc870f67f9096b5ab10df28a8f3ed31fbdcc05b0
- transaction
- 7051171c3da8215490de90af77f4f72381b2569cd5d351ada36a48a441943835computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 56310
the chainentry 56310
- sealed to the entry before
- 825305e3b5a6a9546724566f09d2f54ae81eb8baa0815f771c218770dbb52d10
- this leaf
- d6623cf6bcfe14654ea9ec2a1aa87fb9ab100c91a30891798ab56265e5c57d18
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- BKnrkWoOrhAY7Z+Zs8AICedkRazLDXo0ES4Gi61/klASa9tiavmJ0HUrEDs6PAedpo97ZdTiP2MSUNzn1i7JBw==