why1 reason
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GAU3S3G43V47FSTDSH45L7Q2RV6DTU6JMSMT2KFDRANSORJ7RQITEG2O, which is not in the allowlist
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 86bfcc7b71f6b6cacc05ed409f5d505c70a72fbdece308dec46d857cfb6f0016
- request
- 52bb5acd45ed163b414dbebf910087e6c9e7dd27025f34bd33ae241697a84ca2
- transaction
- 7a2349a2b2d2039a5bff085b93317c4d471f25658c305b04736403ba179914b3computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 50371
the chainentry 50371
- sealed to the entry before
- d40ab3090d554e522af96615fb3ff7d298f9e477cfbe9741c84fb30f2c2594db
- this leaf
- d6e0fc9b5cc2433520660e3f73be8b1de910cd67bdb8cb3a9d21855b475183cf
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- jO8Oi+j7bNjlyD7xa3slZ70PQaq78SHZsBtxBV54+8dnMvV9xADb8QIm120bOPh4JcOzppxUDfNKzfUnM8UaBQ==