livelog 10,984 entries · root 1cf77a8f6197 · read 00:47:54
the record/entry 7393
DENY
refused before it reached the network
this would take GBU6XBULDZ56TCDS5Z3UDXUV5GSX6RNULWLMU5EMP6RGTI5FUGKAN3NL to 30 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
decided in 6.298ms2026-08-14 05:32:26
why1 reason
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded

this would take GBU6XBULDZ56TCDS5Z3UDXUV5GSX6RNULWLMU5EMP6RGTI5FUGKAN3NL to 30 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent

what it was decided fromfingerprints
rule compiled from it
0f52600c2cfc866bd0d9c5542e020f6162dbd4974584341ffd35f551d4eaf04c
request
edd2b1b151d7d3e5bad47461287c7de0d0e3467ba89e3df98b734d9b31d8c7ac
transaction
fe20d1dc6507bce397f99c81db742ca25ddd7b1f78d6efe630e4c8be7f0b71f1
computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 7393
recomputing…
the chainentry 7393
sealed to the entry before
3551b454056c8c2e93c62b75609e1773e7dda2e942b9dded3dcfc6a4bd11f0b3
this leaf
d7c6fe2f02a7070e3fde3da207d1e6279ae7a0e1edfe55ba5cfc58271066348a
signed by
GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
signature
TkN8+KG++TuL3Z8B47U6JoGMgorMfwcMHNYeLMO1pGobDAbVhjZfR8XVeU4Pz5hdQaqMsVPLg5YteIWba87oDA==