why2 reasons
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GCTGEDFK2DE6O255LYO6TPLNDVDZK7QYGL3BXDGJRYERAAVSX7XHKLPN, which is not in the allowlist
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 700.0000000, cap is 500
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 8ef76c4885b50e3d552e42a162f98e24d96ae02fc35a926e808de57aba0259e5
- request
- 841f13b07726aeb92dcc2158e01cddd7ca00a32fdba1ba7cf7ef04dcb32194bd
- transaction
- 7e39c45b0c2929d6dec2fb0278436b408d0b19ce34acbb6e70bc9c4d66f85580computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 56289
the chainentry 56289
- sealed to the entry before
- 7c79411bea9451f853549f3b77efdaa72e02631dd35362c69c5b370928bf545f
- this leaf
- d9fc6dcdb63eb8b33ecdf9bf62af094de3c7e231ee9aa6f98f481253316e23ac
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- F8R8PvuhFCZGxZ7HMiku+x+CA8xW6du1Dn1mRBKIIvLlWOW4SYOd0Xy1+LE77PBqCdiCxvJMw22ksNNrVykpCw==