why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GAKVJRISNZBFBZX4SQHFYAAGMG3M7TRIOJ3YTZL24JMMLMOQL5KVI6CK to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- a7b7e13a64e630fefb61adc6b9644e6e7e83b71996514b7ea640f1a2d107f1e4
- request
- 4f29a54f8cefd5d65e58a7b4f0eb775ced167f6c3633a846a98e0d4f77aa73c3
- transaction
- 1946cf3c33b0ea727ec0d153cc619284e8f68e887e9d18dd074af67bbb25a55bcomputed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 47117
the chainentry 47117
- sealed to the entry before
- cbfd4f8d8ddc542793d04db4da11526838ab586af272090ac6eaa293a8b5c72e
- this leaf
- da49df220a901fa12f780ae960ac3f2efa2fd18070a56e51b167273431a0c682
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- 4+PODUUy0mygsKjf/b4tiBk9mM4a2yOLC8YH1EV2/gzGONCoGquyqqxLEst7Uc82vARyamFRkw3IEFmyQvyhDQ==