why2 reasons
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GBAPWRUCGU7BSWWJO4MY3MQ7G7BB2QDW3WXKDCSB3QDAOGLEYBG6SYVP, which is not in the allowlist
counterpartycounterparty_denied
GBAPWRUCGU7BSWWJO4MY3MQ7G7BB2QDW3WXKDCSB3QDAOGLEYBG6SYVP is on the screening list: you placed this account on the screening list for this run
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- b66ac96fd35c626767fab5b9a054b9e5fc0f46c9471376deedf618c3568669a9
- request
- 7a5315ae9aa591b299f162643eec4bd7b0c19de7d53fad53ed616b6176f43b34
- transaction
- 7c98233a11f8f63d6eb945e4cd071d11367ec89a903c13cbd77c8bce169a24ebcomputed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 487
the chainentry 487
- sealed to the entry before
- c2063fa19d6a7b521fbf287ad8fd8213b1bcc631b63580aae86a8db2459624ed
- this leaf
- da67419f27d73850403ca5f80deca040cfc1cfe8ec6310b852dbde31eed7ba9f
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- Qs2aTayyKVpmj2Dy+aAbs9dO5OEIJoAceU4guxaAfpohrXo24zUwtySziz+DedpV4qUPWVHOA1IDDXQuYVAODA==