why2 reasons
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GAHNAY7KLKFEKMGO2EJXNLDEVQ4WXGU7CKC3ANRJNX2FHMYLJFFJU7QB, which is not in the allowlist
counterpartycounterparty_denied
GAHNAY7KLKFEKMGO2EJXNLDEVQ4WXGU7CKC3ANRJNX2FHMYLJFFJU7QB is on the screening list: you placed this account on the screening list for this run
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 10abf394a87e7603fdda2d9c419091b9494f93c8def4373c6f8a54a126084d30
- request
- a2dc148bbb68cd616568807272c7872f3d7d6e465bf3f1c68d31658967d4f693
- transaction
- 36cbfef5a0edd2d9600d3380a0ee892de1620ca4cc74e12e2d65e054542aea8bcomputed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 59568
the chainentry 59568
- sealed to the entry before
- b2cddfce664636a2de51b33d3773405557ffd497acb434cff3d40b319bbd464d
- this leaf
- dabacfaea75b76f07b678517bb9d1cbf9f1aa13b76defb9b5fbecc4efce13aff
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- rTMLd4f15FjJNovqFq58UB6BMVsavBrSWeQY31pIXQ9clIrNvtlHT+31y74Vedxi4Rjhry1whG2SeIBKFjs5Bg==