why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GDQANT5BK2EYD2XUENG7ZC466JTGW5SJVTN6A5O55TPB2QDFELUSM4JU to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 04d5d1011d12ac00494049fb0877a0b0490a125ce42546c76c05a1fe3fd1bf51
- request
- 0a465966d353e0b96d8a696b40246ce168b026c5dc00cc3185d24b9f7702143c
- transaction
- 8c091dc5c818ce860678256178722fb2c5d2778a5ca2b36ac94318d582158af5computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 44642
the chainentry 44642
- sealed to the entry before
- 602fcc145177091b1cb342d65b6c9c11f803cc323c55fd03166b963c0ff3071e
- this leaf
- dac302638650cd16d121dee3533bd441a1fa049545c744b17d23a4a6bbcf2a5c
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- 9w2rpEML6P7w4jGpC3qyDDZHL5iGQiMy6aqNBbo2ZfKp9hyu06BsCWGB1+OKlahZWQX2xVsuGYDMzW+gkMEWAA==