why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GC7AFHVO6PURSA3D2NYHGY2XGQLVAH5BEJTDMJAP5I3ZOAWI5YGJ35MT to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- ac5c6b16360e0e796fda3a38e463e96a637446897e3331c7f53da22d5106cca8
- request
- d5eae3c0b07b398b1fdcf8edc2ffd9374575dbf64894475ea7cf0e10eb90d064
- transaction
- 7cae6c521e3b38eea0bb349525cfdd1458cd78b9f0020fb155ca1932df63c4a8computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 28077
the chainentry 28077
- sealed to the entry before
- 19bd8e6e2fc7d64dddc7723a3982172b1f1cd396bedec5b70f79cc720fb40972
- this leaf
- dba03d4afef3db19b1cab0f39c76f06f34abb00461043a62a747ee2cf69afb27
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- xTHQfeEw31P/xObaOzX4GFSM2Vy/3zLWEzvrLD9TbOSrRhi/qlZGy1JyrmTi6Kj6rXFJWNaJw6V3c3PgVt0xAA==