why3 reasons
realitydelegated_fee_payer
fees are paid by GCJKUE3UWPFARQZP2XJ6ZMZ7ZMV5F4HBD44UY2GFLXWWI72O3OJK7Z2A, an account the mandate never named
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GDHTPSKTQ55EGPYVMF5VAD5IYPXPS3VAGWVKFMYC6E7P5ZX4WITRMNV4, which is not in the allowlist
counterpartycounterparty_denied
GDHTPSKTQ55EGPYVMF5VAD5IYPXPS3VAGWVKFMYC6E7P5ZX4WITRMNV4 is on the screening list: you placed this account on the screening list for this run
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 9faecfdf991812a9b391a73c5687cb240c43d6691f6c75fabdce31e4da82578a
- request
- 508582381e936ef73d55b9aa4fee35143ed0c5db1cb72b77bb28b6e2a0c04666
- transaction
- 64e2e98e9837eb37ddec1b71bd305b67d8dec05056ff878e38d21862fa65f8dacomputed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 63869
the chainentry 63869
- sealed to the entry before
- 308cdfeb4b0dae8006783b85718b2b4a2d18746fef77b0a5ea69022ce6e71ba5
- this leaf
- dc0dd574c643d6a3fed80c5e4f99a7f4a5831b7393d83d05fc800f4467e555ed
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- xU3Tt8VbEArftvV32iiZqb5gUXKY43zRKbNtpc2j1dk+4neIPPgy40OQRs5sIgkU60/qfC8dirMK7qPaMbPMCw==