why1 reason
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GDKZOIUW6ECRZTINB3NZCEEJ64D7QEGJBURUXLNN2SCTWZWKCZHSQ5IW, which is not in the allowlist
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 248aa8d7c6b98a8304c0a812e558825708b11fb2d88a6b3a344e368d858bf8de
- request
- 2255913f210b66ca2b82996c54d597b8c3b49e7cc086f84ea9fdd9b87553dfb9
- transaction
- 90576a072ee4c271f4cccf68575810f58cd2cf8e86aec2e27c6d7c17238d2e6fcomputed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 50283
the chainentry 50283
- sealed to the entry before
- 39dce1bd2f0243e900867249847d4a703085d16fe0768f2d29d516ed23d6edce
- this leaf
- dc15e7d3a0bade6a4a2d48245c6f298dd4916990aed807dc6cfb36a4223c511f
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- pJaeFmb2GS4WDG5mHfguG8qW/Bzo4snHoR+1PMYqvojrloZms7v/v1bTCdsqY9hywJFuyTTyNzKuKiPMH6RcDg==