livelog 23,670 entries · root 83fb66a362c5 · read 21:33:26
the record/entry 22839
DENY
refused before it reached the network
this would take GAUHHMWWYSCPUXLDJ2XERJZS5UESONMN5V6SJ4KDZGRBFTUQU73KF5WZ to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
decided in 7.231ms2026-08-26 06:22:31
why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded

this would take GAUHHMWWYSCPUXLDJ2XERJZS5UESONMN5V6SJ4KDZGRBFTUQU73KF5WZ to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent

mandateamount_exceeds_cap

op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40

what it was decided fromfingerprints
rule compiled from it
112c1143c1e92920e92df5e6e6676641e33e8e60b9853f6b0d2a8f6c94584433
request
56f97f8960524ce249e91734441c555b614a60b9250a2ba6131f69383f095813
transaction
1e91bfaec7057cc6a8e105feab7bddf3c580663378a9071054f50b4137262905
computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 22839
recomputing…
the chainentry 22839
sealed to the entry before
66c72449f3d14279e119e7af47505b01cfacfbac1c85afc6c67c7f558fc65b1c
this leaf
dc37055b92b8278cfe350a548cc30901d5a43759ff5ea3ddf5a43a84c699ebd3
signed by
GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
signature
uzjJg5TJtYHlS5IeIS9ZOXM361pM5wPieDCfNod5xdtFFr5w271IBPvEp8AHHLdB+WeyugmwRBRpwjRDBrUYAA==