why2 reasons
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GDGDDG4G6M6JQZYEZBJYVHMNAV64DZVRJEFDAPG7YHWRJG465QNSGKXS, which is not in the allowlist
counterpartycounterparty_denied
GDGDDG4G6M6JQZYEZBJYVHMNAV64DZVRJEFDAPG7YHWRJG465QNSGKXS is on the screening list: you placed this account on the screening list for this run
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 922452b8da0000fd092081b38558b8927ffc56311b5337d4d1cc9bc270e0a9fe
- request
- 50fa45bc6c795c03f581b7c7c772a7cdc03aafb3ba34954fd4d5cd4ec6a980ea
- transaction
- bd0c8c106e527e3a227cd136bd9e251fd08fa6b7c05961d10f4891e39ed8cbd9computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 69854
the chainentry 69854
- sealed to the entry before
- e209f459e823058d731edaa3a2025da3ea08fd8b94abe3ec0377eb98037d5728
- this leaf
- dcbe08ba47fb1a53d7c8d8f9817e34338a03853926dc04db5270d844ef585a44
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- PY9M9BCGnBnwGK0TWXmQxLxeas1mQLayse7gJGnhrh/urYyhyMaZ+8e8gAXnEPl3d2OZKBTxIwD7p0G7x4X4AQ==