livelog 28,972 entries · root 017e165e43de · read 23:47:55
the record/entry 28841
DENY
refused before it reached the network
this would take GB7CDNEMVDOD5RPJCFXTUXOVVBDK6B6EMTMRRVNDIW6P5ZY66VPKUYTV to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
decided in 7.293ms2026-08-30 21:32:34
why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded

this would take GB7CDNEMVDOD5RPJCFXTUXOVVBDK6B6EMTMRRVNDIW6P5ZY66VPKUYTV to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent

mandateamount_exceeds_cap

op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40

what it was decided fromfingerprints
rule compiled from it
f0331c88e501b0be7cadfa01aa58a3ec626161123d736a8f48401dbbc0a1d3c5
request
02b30b50c75704cea1870cf240e4712f1e25d62d22ec4da8db6d2f1ad6746e0d
transaction
78d1be0e26d64d1c09e95355169652353c4f44ea9af8c28bf1527a4cd6e3d518
computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 28841
recomputing…
the chainentry 28841
sealed to the entry before
0ea96dfb1372924c001a16dc6e5dd85b8ccb383a2991dbb1692d645d55a784d4
this leaf
dd0714da0204fc429d4ae6062efe6221a119f39398642f14b8b4d02bfeed8347
signed by
GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
signature
JSRZUvfDhzRlso4eRR1BYZEYWebvjvuIQlW9cFDL7ue/1jDCr7yNsfrnp1NWR7+8TbOCbdMcqQhhXePkaqQWBA==