why2 reasons
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GAPCIOB4DUEFRDY4LHEER3G75WDTE4E6MM6WJBAQ4Q2YZ27GEG5EF4XL, which is not in the allowlist
counterpartycounterparty_denied
GAPCIOB4DUEFRDY4LHEER3G75WDTE4E6MM6WJBAQ4Q2YZ27GEG5EF4XL is on the screening list: you placed this account on the screening list for this run
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- fb690aadb06f8cde378c416b459484991f661aafdda553d7b46d79ab90eb4f65
- request
- f6f738f4e147a049d15bbc5879c29553ee77b85f82ce6331c618f9fcb0c03662
- transaction
- 094a7ae693db47c42b00a44517aac912f6255250df6dad8a7393429f0692eb89computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 18018
the chainentry 18018
- sealed to the entry before
- 0d474af964f319f11bf1c97bf8e4c0640654dc9e264349314bd2fbe0a3b6425d
- this leaf
- dd1971bda27c1600f042f16029a01b32fdcfd97bfcbd9ff2539ed33a4c41aa1f
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- XpFZT3XIrjFH8om9CshlJnNpz4BfN+lw0M63eHMoeY654+H1uS7yGGc2AnMcGANptCjPbuS4gTKBTnpBH2QNCg==