livelog 35,848 entries · root 33aa059a2174 · read 07:19:23
the record/entry 35735
DENY
refused before it reached the network
this would take GCGHHEJBFMWZ5OKPCOAVRBQCPCT75EAATSRQEQOGZCWQZU5AEK54Z54K to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
decided in 7.973ms2026-09-05 04:57:33
why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded

this would take GCGHHEJBFMWZ5OKPCOAVRBQCPCT75EAATSRQEQOGZCWQZU5AEK54Z54K to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent

mandateamount_exceeds_cap

op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40

what it was decided fromfingerprints
rule compiled from it
eb8a95e9b533aab00ce3a3b63ad731b58806f321ba1f22ebea5b64320dbf1c15
request
d05bed4430ff3c6058ef668e926c369eb92c47486a955b02b9d59af30b9923d9
transaction
8091fa8da175f5c94feebe82e49551979df9c034f6e8dfc16aeecbbec69442ab
computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 35735
recomputing…
the chainentry 35735
sealed to the entry before
a4b452e1b983236a3f33cc98c8c5129c4e4555ba808aec36bba045ef1c807f99
this leaf
dd2d37cecb1b0bc2b3d6658936d9f3a8be5803e1cd1bb87e6f198237cbf874d8
signed by
GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
signature
oqgzAwBMJYh/H8b4pcShO38syY7UdbUrZV9VKwOm4AOAZLLRdDTG/xCgzLcZEChznZJZe3L1exwFq8sQEh32Bw==