why2 reasons
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GD7EVPWOS4DIPHB7W5QE3TRGZK4TUSOYAQKLCSTIPPJRV422DN3EGW5G, which is not in the allowlist
counterpartycounterparty_denied
GD7EVPWOS4DIPHB7W5QE3TRGZK4TUSOYAQKLCSTIPPJRV422DN3EGW5G is on the screening list: you placed this account on the screening list for this run
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 4a8e41d274d8b9f8beeb401abc2292b177d3ce05a7f9869a06ab918c423d68bc
- request
- 4aa451de40ab91ad12d31a5cfa12cf191157740e1c1f39897f7a72cbc7d42ea0
- transaction
- 98e84b037f6a0d07cacc9346465c81a1b18ecdb5e345b999fa5197a0a37ef0e0computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 76621
the chainentry 76621
- sealed to the entry before
- 2c759be6b6f685b5e2923c8f3a1be55adf9a03c2f9c9a60f4d723211b293d488
- this leaf
- dd4ceea462cd795fde4e60e87c6d96a2fbc8ecd787e8e7ebfee7c568410e8d52
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- scOZigaaZVbmZoP5uN14eLTwwekhTrOJf1WAotZKv4eP+oi7cBgSVb/DKKFiBQdgO/atTBl+Zhm7pNjlwWzZBQ==