livelog 14,886 entries · root 77c3170b4eba · read 01:57:41
the record/entry 13568
DENY
refused before it reached the network
this would take GARDVCMYSGKTJ2ZSCPIERXRGLU3NAMC3OAXXBI67WN7I35NY6IXAIEDW to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
decided in 6.675ms2026-08-19 00:47:30
why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded

this would take GARDVCMYSGKTJ2ZSCPIERXRGLU3NAMC3OAXXBI67WN7I35NY6IXAIEDW to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent

mandateamount_exceeds_cap

op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40

what it was decided fromfingerprints
rule compiled from it
55b5d9043ea8aaaf11adc2147586dbd58bad3d2b1669635171b6865255858045
request
9991d627e17e1758e774384ffaaf25173ee16dc3287fb026d39d4704e429eddc
transaction
2906ae59d52fd40b7bed736e68abc25ee598ebefcafc8127330e4a137f08268c
computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 13568
recomputing…
the chainentry 13568
sealed to the entry before
f4f088343dcf5feca67f91770982156ff0fda7303c213ee7c9bee9503a7083bf
this leaf
dd9ffba7e6f1eb9fa1f9b9c831a248612bc6b37a12a7f3a11dd7edb7d885d136
signed by
GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
signature
ZJoKpA+fYE7Nraar8iyXPpvdYuiyJiYmIsQRprRoIQ5o6I4ac7R2+9VfstEdMq9ZUYXzcZFrRHrVFlVHa344Dg==