livelog 28,913 entries · root 4303005a357c · read 22:43:05
the record/entry 28779
DENY
refused before it reached the network
this would take GCJNLYK32AWHNTQ5AFK2RQDDCBJGKYD6G4YD5JFACUYZ6I6A3QZHCOJD to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
decided in 7.149ms2026-08-30 20:27:34
why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded

this would take GCJNLYK32AWHNTQ5AFK2RQDDCBJGKYD6G4YD5JFACUYZ6I6A3QZHCOJD to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent

mandateamount_exceeds_cap

op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40

what it was decided fromfingerprints
rule compiled from it
1e3e85eb5e16c287cdde365b3249d790786ea99b77751d709bb52e3fbc2b2258
request
af5685c0ce3a92e4441dada2d5cc30f9e41bed0bf0be4857167eef38cf4c55fa
transaction
1af6ad1ca5bd179dfc546bc7b0d54c9e54a79628c74c5c97b653f38542a13607
computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 28779
recomputing…
the chainentry 28779
sealed to the entry before
5f141bfb368c23a32868ebe9e3f477d23c566947b6ced7f062ebbbda84151c08
this leaf
dda2b65f9f2a5d8ff9f2352116a81bde909ddf230c286d023f2743dd3c4a1794
signed by
GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
signature
EGkTWzI3KabLYATXoGjToD6mY2RQQPmZ6UAxu38E3dmiNbRLrwYXNNjfCsIrJpx2lOz88AtVmdgHymzlJvSHBA==