livelog 29,123 entries · root bb507527fa51 · read 02:47:53
the record/entry 29018
DENY
refused before it reached the network
this would take GDTSWIT7FJ6OEJORTE3OPOHW6CEUJGCQZMUPMY4K2EJ4LV2C6FJGPI74 to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
decided in 6.899ms2026-08-31 00:42:34
why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded

this would take GDTSWIT7FJ6OEJORTE3OPOHW6CEUJGCQZMUPMY4K2EJ4LV2C6FJGPI74 to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent

mandateamount_exceeds_cap

op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40

what it was decided fromfingerprints
rule compiled from it
bd91a66ffc44499ef763102e3d416e70a255b26a60ee320c83c4771c6660287b
request
6fb936d81c59c74d1ba1a44b33bf52a11555b67565c328829aab03f0c0400c4d
transaction
2f6015440173450ad71ec8b1e22b6755288d99a131afdfbfbb250392384855d9
computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 29018
recomputing…
the chainentry 29018
sealed to the entry before
0329c2e019509a6c51108a28073df251c8493d73f975bcecbb7c908d2594a727
this leaf
ddc43fcef69d70a8d2eaefa83e17a7a0a833681bbde5d45d7bdf2becacd07127
signed by
GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
signature
CZJFzlQg+UT8FUw4UXxCIqiEIMa82DGVwnDDLtaU0Cuo774sDmLjUfFuxJ0VupG5KYhEP1Km2RkQoxHp9nrUAg==