why2 reasons
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GCHDS7MIX6FZABB7I5AHJI2MK7Z6652TEDPCTWEORFA5ITQLLSU27WQH, which is not in the allowlist
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 700.0000000, cap is 500
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- a358918ca5da997f738555ad060a1a75406a75108ad895b883f0238f4fcd204c
- request
- 35431636202595ca7f56387d2031006894ae43f821a0e350457b66685e15715d
- transaction
- 301abc764f32a4a700346b88d10d6c094756e2394fd32f5364484d388df2a221computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 58688
the chainentry 58688
- sealed to the entry before
- 5268ae77b81d9ced89c7955115eecea09f27ddcebc5f2d7f7a4b30cb8485cac5
- this leaf
- ddce39dbf398b314b1a1539d3dcdf95537eb41d3e05c3118846afbacd0f617d2
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- 4mX0LmdWmeL8Dp7A1S7J2CeWlbTiEREeGW/It2UfXHpHRKx5AgLIahY48PGjqqnHoNeuYVjEmwM0agi/ta6+CQ==