why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GBGSMD4PZMTK7UWGFINJRMSM4FREGGYWERJ5AR2ZJYWDG4IM3J5LEMI6 to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- d64633bc03c59f742ac7f0cba4bb6acf6c9e9eff61ed0eaf0b44f9052f1726d3
- request
- 27453b8499fb680a054283dcda26f80e0c79145f5c9e8f1038aa1acf07d7fe81
- transaction
- 59849e2804173af5615aa3c1ff9aaff468b93e85fd5631568da299159613745acomputed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 72417
the chainentry 72417
- sealed to the entry before
- d00355895838ff7eec104ea2efe70c1c33ad4b20a7f0bf153872cd3ee0942692
- this leaf
- dddd116aa66baaed437a24d29bd68c5d006e3681847c040b6850466bcc796581
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- ZolwXG66WkeQ7VQXhuAy1rl2r8yS6DPL9oQM3pg+OnHgrK+rv1eYsA9yuysv/88ac0DQVrkDCcoIdjc1AeuGCA==