why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GDSU3VUXSUEXRH2G4I5VXH7KSUQ35PEEIMOWWV3WUECXOMLRDHPMQ6DP to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 13c7fba0e23af722258c1dab008f548f053681fada270d9fb4fb6e66895d0824
- request
- e2a48931b0f299ff263fbcfa9e0838709a891c48feb382c3e983e9a6cd6b1815
- transaction
- 6c3b898e697b714f86d7f632171a57e3ca21b9700a9e0b8d48b3861028e9f815computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 71056
the chainentry 71056
- sealed to the entry before
- f86174c2af36f56de3c5488a66b95223b5e82bb2404a2511d65899d7f5f02d3d
- this leaf
- df09416e8be45949892898b94eefb22835a96394a312d8166c1ffac46d7e5060
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- XxD4bRNZ+9CuNfDf2mIMNxAMtEMl9+quhBY2YtoHazYTmC3C10YrhNae+fsmo2muxaeompX5AY/CS3o4FXpsAQ==