livelog 56,978 entries · root b3775adc39d7 · read 06:26:31
the record/entry 56704
DENY
refused before it reached the network
this would take GAZWTGKJCY2PXAWFLIHN7HI2K23GZ3I5R3BYVEHXIUDBEM6MJPF2EDUK to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
decided in 7.617ms2026-09-21 00:56:16
why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded

this would take GAZWTGKJCY2PXAWFLIHN7HI2K23GZ3I5R3BYVEHXIUDBEM6MJPF2EDUK to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent

mandateamount_exceeds_cap

op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40

what it was decided fromfingerprints
rule compiled from it
570431a47ee19b7fb07ce307e1b6c3e1b5a9426900e3f73f929114ddf98f370a
request
68d8ab7d7573396148cb032bc224d7aae16f1e1fff19df34abb1e5a4f00cc743
transaction
ee285d1b3f86eb084540a6ae65c8a02affafe56381a420c14bcc52b77c910586
computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 56704
recomputing…
the chainentry 56704
sealed to the entry before
4862677414136362bf2987e68b72946dd7e1a589128ac6380b456cdbe03bd0ed
this leaf
dff51802b48af382af454a88fbbe8272bed95da6659afb2fe07ec721fa002c86
signed by
GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
signature
mSMHDypObjWKhiJU0WZVBpOajXj8lkB2mmVqOM9m+mVstCStx5Yma70yeFAijDd3w5aAcFMHVjaQLmXLkocGDA==