livelog 18,155 entries · root ce20baab0c35 · read 14:59:48
the record/entry 17855
DENY
refused before it reached the network
this would take GDSXF4HI3MEFGKUSQLXW7I47XXJKMTTDRX2T6NWHYA2DBDH2GA4JVYH2 to 108 over the last 60000ms, above the 90 window cap, with 78 already spent
decided in 7.316ms2026-08-22 09:12:42
why1 reason
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded

this would take GDSXF4HI3MEFGKUSQLXW7I47XXJKMTTDRX2T6NWHYA2DBDH2GA4JVYH2 to 108 over the last 60000ms, above the 90 window cap, with 78 already spent

what it was decided fromfingerprints
rule compiled from it
70b9e91ee70b03586a6a19f2d6cd1bac5fd1d8a4d5ea8870866105048a24978d
request
52bf7ec455aa1c5b0c7a9ec0d09838e1f43c997a94e097570246241f66079f7f
transaction
cdcee4823c00156b0c72cdb83d1407ef18641daa5c6ff32b0a7954d320ef4620
computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 17855
recomputing…
the chainentry 17855
sealed to the entry before
e9a6f2e130df0af2b56ae0cc9853db9ee1f39f817d186fbba724f3d868c72243
this leaf
e047d98131d28cb3b5d15d8bcc6ae07a840a09bf2f017f5a0a803b5bbc74198c
signed by
GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
signature
wcZGrSpGkTtj+ccgo7Z3X/ORotq/IQ4yHW1cNecl+d5f9WEO6NFMlp/MRlLpM2a0uKTkuZgcWf1NDDOxtSKwDA==