why2 reasons
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GAYLV4EHR3MZXQX77GADR4V7H5BCCEXPFZWKCURNKEDUNKY24KFFDNH2, which is not in the allowlist
counterpartycounterparty_denied
GAYLV4EHR3MZXQX77GADR4V7H5BCCEXPFZWKCURNKEDUNKY24KFFDNH2 is on the screening list: you placed this account on the screening list for this run
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- c00ff6edc699799dbde7d56f193e7fc4fca8180ddad2f3cfb1b693bd676a10ff
- request
- a337d9f97ceee986dc9bf273e905d888d7b4fcbb4254fe5bafadc972197c4a48
- transaction
- b112404f903a2189c15e049f5fbd70cec9bac8a93301776bb021b820e511d864computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 42830
the chainentry 42830
- sealed to the entry before
- 3eda8b76bbf961b113399237dd5c061ce047a7549f6dbcb891541a89d87f0ce8
- this leaf
- e083ee4a5b20595471672837abfdc62deb2e249204f2d383b2f9d0f7f7ba3ac1
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- CRJ1HKHzxirv5heKc1VqkB5plOtmbtVoueIVs4im24D5EMQsNnrZxzjqCcoRimtqkJg2fFiQ6UTjrtxVQnulBg==