why2 reasons
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GAKDDQYQJKPJ5IF5DUEWDK2HJPKE4UYSFTFHJIH3WKUB5ATA452LKXVD, which is not in the allowlist
counterpartycounterparty_denied
GAKDDQYQJKPJ5IF5DUEWDK2HJPKE4UYSFTFHJIH3WKUB5ATA452LKXVD is on the screening list: you placed this account on the screening list for this run
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 9416ed935781cbef2f3b44abbc1fd4abd9d798bd3ae1f72529fbec585bcaef69
- request
- 8d8a7d3491b9de8b7fa5856b9a556a346aeac8dd60de41c5d98d566e3aead3af
- transaction
- 4f8eafbb80f302423fa498bc1fb279f06aa404f20290315ffe4e684e27f6e789computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 697
the chainentry 697
- sealed to the entry before
- f08c41926637199cbaf9b822c1154588aabd090afd216f624d48c5b8b9a6ce02
- this leaf
- e266d99277db8cd6886a8ef6c506e62e33f919bf32e9ba0363a81b372b3f7818
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- hP5n5p33SVKIqRp5holJvvsfhIj272+JgHtXA8JMq+Rdcbc2R2COKp/K7QmIsiQ6JnfolXLdPl2gVnKcnhS8Cw==