why2 reasons
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GAMYM3VXMF4Q72HIZOBT2SXDFSQ4XVG6GCYOBQPFGRDTRCY6ROC43LAH, which is not in the allowlist
counterpartycounterparty_denied
GAMYM3VXMF4Q72HIZOBT2SXDFSQ4XVG6GCYOBQPFGRDTRCY6ROC43LAH is on the screening list: you placed this account on the screening list for this run
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 090e486202685016a39489cdf8d15178bba42c7268b7dfc469b19254cc4a6d79
- request
- cfb60b5801d04453835fafeed259ce5ce8ca7815197fd2401540d305333471fe
- transaction
- 811414f38ced0e5eb5af1de543eb0de32e122ad71a8c72071898b82e05bad0d7computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 10159
the chainentry 10159
- sealed to the entry before
- d8fe598ba0ab6920fbdb15264e0e3f62e6a995461fa8ef1c4db00e73b03ed86a
- this leaf
- e2832f678129d9bfd0319284ffdec6c9a6b3efccf46f5f755744f17737813aca
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- DglG6p+VQFmjbzqdrGfAkstEmmG+O4d/K+acWUu2VwaZ+bMawycGS4xT8aluMR9pqq5og1WoEumz9G9UhmOACg==