why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GDQOEE4O34AK6Z2G3KKOCJ6WHYZF3ZUPP4YJ6NZGURCAIG25ZVLROX5O to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- da9b744b5d14f17271a5352e9051e8ce4e1966681aebdc6bfde12d1e4530379e
- request
- 2741a638a2fd113d0e5abea5b9d815f79b17079ce90f58ea059a01e1a0e4638f
- transaction
- 3bffd9aea5e0f36b91f26030189abe1b57224e3bfdf6e71cbd8eb6784f4d34e3computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 3782
the chainentry 3782
- sealed to the entry before
- 0ee6f06e43a3e36a20f883249ae5126ed3d3045de61c09c4ef7722733f5fa257
- this leaf
- e3a62d197dedb7491bd820c4f6039a45c4da2a596238fd3ee64d9918a699d417
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- XIixYhxHtjThoRw5hw4WvzuoiGI3LxVtIf5wxBkm2icAEuS9CqCYhleAyaEgru9o1ycqKnFG1cDjQ/nvYFHyAQ==