why2 reasons
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GBG2G7WDH74SMM6XTF6PTERNCCTKJUPC2XHPBFVOGC7ER6TR2JX6YMIP, which is not in the allowlist
counterpartycounterparty_denied
GBG2G7WDH74SMM6XTF6PTERNCCTKJUPC2XHPBFVOGC7ER6TR2JX6YMIP is on the screening list: counterparty 0x101ce0cedd142f199c9ef61739ae59b6611a0fc0 is flagged by ScamSniffer. 0x101ce0cedd142f199c9ef61739ae59b6611a0fc0 is on scamsniffer's open drainer blacklist. source: scamsniffer/scam-database, live copy from 2026-09-08.
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 1adbcfb75bccc05f823444b0ec97897ea7743d4bfdf526df1255dcf156334a2d
- request
- 7bf3ccab87260f35989b497c6362281a7f314f69d0522d29c9e55bc914042047
- transaction
- 4a1149e0b1984e45298022ec6c971d8b5bb65bd7d44877795d0085586c2a9cf5computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 50291
the chainentry 50291
- sealed to the entry before
- fc80b4eebf1e11ff502e2e9e824e2b3895f2bd22947ade73b2dbfd1419e92fbf
- this leaf
- e51aa8a896ed678b7bbd06027c4ca9a3857bcf23b954816e497799e493b780ca
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- yY2gWmeIUC7JBiEofL/GkQkKBmtqS2dA4d/oDP4yU6zJNXb+mwa+GQbNA8ffBytNPgl6XzZwu16oz7UKIDPmBg==