why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GCG4ZLEBHCM6BRIGQK44EOK7Q4F775NCIAQ7BVA3MGUXWHII5NQ7HPCU to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- e038a5229faf05ea2fa8f6aea4766044fe70afc7c7e915ec7722933f2903cc46
- request
- 098665e258c07b2fbc4a80ab85c3fdc627da1731551d61533531e829ff215e51
- transaction
- a8337c18a9c418af634c27bc2ce277f804a0d22e3c97d8db967fb5b6341681f7computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 46547
the chainentry 46547
- sealed to the entry before
- c5d0aad6278b568f58544cf477c1f295042ae421f462ecd06284aa42f5af376f
- this leaf
- e5f145630b5bad3e1b13c6829e7105c95d010fa57a44e4078cd09ba6c844683f
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- Cwzi5P/xiIsMPsrMeDGAaPFuCND/Qlm7wcOsFfslQo9pyw3ZBqtVzDRovAxHF/nWCDhsIKDiTvOgKVTydypNBw==