livelog 31,041 entries · root 8fdade6b193a · read 13:52:54
the record/entry 29850
DENY
refused before it reached the network
this would take GCUA23WPYMHWXYPX6JIYRZDXE5MHWEXTUN3XDWV2WXA5RZ5OCYME36NG to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
decided in 7.143ms2026-08-31 15:37:34
why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded

this would take GCUA23WPYMHWXYPX6JIYRZDXE5MHWEXTUN3XDWV2WXA5RZ5OCYME36NG to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent

mandateamount_exceeds_cap

op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40

what it was decided fromfingerprints
rule compiled from it
96dc4de3ef69f504249cd101efb3f78ee4569d51896e882f16c169434ce8df39
request
bb095e2bfc10f06b446dbbebb7f3a02fe815269ce6ba19e22caaa94d3605f529
transaction
71b4006c854ee195a115f00b883ccb8f65fe1424a8ac8e20c0f859fc4bb8dc37
computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 29850
recomputing…
the chainentry 29850
sealed to the entry before
e25348ef4fc232f37427e23345506047004526b39a8e2f527c7a10f7fbbb610d
this leaf
e5f6015467297b94893b2e4ad09662b1edbf1818ab0a65c5e50560f1abc6941d
signed by
GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
signature
+rTlqWRwqXySEM5uL9AM2E7x4B5YJexejFK1/HB5CRmqjbJkg4/GpPkKhkrLVaC7fFQ6bQ4MThRmI3scmL9bDg==