why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GBM7S7DXMWNO7AJKAEFIMTGLCGBK5FYPKILXBYQAOHIV3G5U7T6AMRWA to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 3123fd2f45e71d436e28deb3fb7f4e10433db4a20d6fd1ada9d55ee9bc87f679
- request
- e4db5c356a03b4aa828254551f9e7d84e55a59c7764519c4e9557f06ebec6f16
- transaction
- c965920dfbf7a78dd59e9d43c30125f47f3cc01c715b3a19b20ea37d8eff01b3computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 43420
the chainentry 43420
- sealed to the entry before
- 8d929c344e8c04953042e3d3d0f22d0f7499e7f24155c084c203d2e251de4b01
- this leaf
- e7ff9326c977676be200a3598922da8c9b84dcce594299e02b139d0cdd587b76
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- z7AIP6WYaQt5Al8jTLMhOkKc5wpqHOsHxzZENnxy75mbSVSbRFxrSJ5w4Hg/9iGFZI/eWW/Pki0T0ClvyyKyBg==