why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GDQ4BIAIU6MDPZJWBQ2DS24LGR6SE6R2YJEQJILPBUP3UUGXP5TA3TWC to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- e4f60d84569b03422271be29b92b911c307222ee2c5aad8a3757848ae51009fe
- request
- b6832a1604ce1db94fdf0ed77d4041ea7e5163902d88f01bcdbffccd7cb58a30
- transaction
- 7d153c6f92a1b319541e8aa67db147e5887b27fcbdedbc31a7547c8406d7fb1ccomputed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 14637
the chainentry 14637
- sealed to the entry before
- d16ef25cde0854af96f14af81904f40e5167b74350fd0267f8d5e4e7f7f5c28d
- this leaf
- ea1a9976428ebce0f31454b88b7a572608ebeeaf8c8a7f0577d8c18404a0decc
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- kx8cGUBWxQRovblyo4rOvlTm1Nej76BM38UeQWbqp7zPKWEoKfi7zHmTjkDZn8VYNvsxNnBIULGTX1grXW1zAA==