why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GCJM7VRBVMSO7XBV7OTN3AQO6OOQZLLQ2NKVZSEVAKJQLC5YEGC6FHAX to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 59d1c36420b9d85a7f386adfb0f99aafd0e17a0a0b7a01c1c2db65e46681472a
- request
- e322c9cc6bb8ba8b385f8c32763ce18959548f5f8e6b4d211bb7e4ab764b819c
- transaction
- 1a43f546507ef3f972122f1b27dbbdc67476a57aa394c3115e07182af770c4eccomputed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 11133
the chainentry 11133
- sealed to the entry before
- d016726d0250715719708c22c17a12a52e9de3d7572015b924ca2ec521833ed2
- this leaf
- edaf101d119d823fcf9fa0b9a36c89ad1253d962730f3dd0d4efaf741ad0efb9
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- 5rIUTySOVyh/wdizQmH2eVR9B7OAL2rAp0WS54HWTBCIzKxZ0MvXGxTsgO3rmlBi02CXvx053y0WEHosK2V1Bw==