why1 reason
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GAKJGATGH45545DNNI7DTZ25VD4KSKIBOKDJF6LUSIGYZVMUZFCKB3E5, which is not in the allowlist
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 48a226bb6a043d9b709b1766136c585a92883cd954a24a43b3416ea79bf3f5fe
- request
- e7fe435f1b4e2717ea2d8fa4fc07c831230585477a18125f2f15b6cb613d64ff
- transaction
- a7f1acc91d118d38dfa9f632b9a55c4618ea54833aabe86daf70b9a4084e693ccomputed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 50387
the chainentry 50387
- sealed to the entry before
- 31810000f1de2db4b2c567ab52e5d62c01bef522a4606df2326516a6521f00ba
- this leaf
- ee2939018344a49227255b30088a4b23f101420875d4b5b43db596cb8b2845bf
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- SxaHa7VstwCi7/IsgKk41U08UCAnNFfa88099opq9fJ0+vb0zcWa/iuKBuwThbmhl3fR1QXFk/zAouahd0OQBA==