why2 reasons
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GC54HWIGSVXBYTO5HTKRGFS3NYOZ5CMYVIDITXSPM3RKO6NK2ISWOOEW, which is not in the allowlist
counterpartycounterparty_denied
GC54HWIGSVXBYTO5HTKRGFS3NYOZ5CMYVIDITXSPM3RKO6NK2ISWOOEW is on the screening list: you placed this account on the screening list for this run
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 047f4ba55addeac5a3215ae972486e4adc1d118e3a8ae32e97b3c3b72b74d2ff
- request
- 5b849b4d368e6373cf79121218c5d483b5f6e72835dfed13c1de04b6acaa6880
- transaction
- 394184fdf5157ab629e6f86e1f6adb8364860fd3f0c47047dc66d553f8dd62dacomputed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 22939
the chainentry 22939
- sealed to the entry before
- 875fb925934df8c7655109ecaf92a7dfc5efd295ade856fd8db013a96fada2a1
- this leaf
- ee4d8a2eab4603fd5213fe36acef02ec793b50cdfd220a69bfad08b61935f8ac
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- hg1BoJ+8dFXvlyyS5wFxMVLBFiTX/3UBKT1MXmm+vzvqK+/CRyTT6AhAaoNUcxhbnVnVeFJiVffZPLtv5P+sDg==