why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GCERTTHU6QT2UAEZHUTNFP4T4LCLU43FOFJCFQSFRAZWIL7532YF4UZQ to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- fecb301d09dc2fb9e4b032c3d5da25fc7ba4654b4c86a7888ce995f4888cb497
- request
- 9fed330b6c3c9f05b67f2ef65ef6bc39feb65bbd685a002e30481b68332126f2
- transaction
- 5547b926b9a5b21535b8fa58c23f9f216a0594f1a5228295d7b45a558975b7ddcomputed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 68872
the chainentry 68872
- sealed to the entry before
- 7c37cf3e8c504154bedac07afd047ff4b67bae8035b7c480f03384ebb8f61c6a
- this leaf
- ee73b6b6234d879d33555cba9cd846daa6dcf4fa33fb6bc38751d55c0accc7be
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- rkOwfyS8d6Q39riwrrqCveR39sd9IBXmtnF43uQMF6MOdnMiMgcve6kr4o1JEK5jl7HCSpsyr/K7DGRwEvhoAg==