livelog 44,567 entries · root c69ecbb3e12b · read 01:00:22
the record/entry 43893
DENY
refused before it reached the network
this would take GDJPHVMX3GXQ7TNK2SKIXDEI3VLSAQIGZCUWNE6QLKHEKCU3CCPGGROV to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
decided in 7.364ms2026-09-11 12:30:10
why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded

this would take GDJPHVMX3GXQ7TNK2SKIXDEI3VLSAQIGZCUWNE6QLKHEKCU3CCPGGROV to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent

mandateamount_exceeds_cap

op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40

what it was decided fromfingerprints
rule compiled from it
000fe9c9d0c965706ca9d41fb6992eb7c55fc46fc85e407f43ccca6fc0a73b80
request
b221ddd70cd537274ec48dd5107373a663d86ceb0cd96fe3d261850895b794da
transaction
6e9a8e7abd0335a331cfedea734e83716f48550a0b7a16db86b0d037392e9b6e
computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 43893
recomputing…
the chainentry 43893
sealed to the entry before
00fedf55a6c082c4f05337aca2bfa5fcfb6e2b3d12e4aa892cd6105c9c68411d
this leaf
ef81d87ebe23fd00962e0e944bfd540653cdfd9eaee1120a477ec967fb2799cb
signed by
GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
signature
rHDyfYGew9a76g90slEyHfAIDBop3zSvJ4h38v+CANFKJpeITcET7Rm2mcNB8E66xrQd15OCNS1p1RCo4IZkBA==