livelog 18,693 entries · root 5ac60a6259d3 · read 01:02:53
the record/entry 18469
DENY
refused before it reached the network
this would take GAGWNSREYQYGNMWWBQWWXYVVLLSS66VX5BBKKNPTINWDMDORIBSAGXTE to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
decided in 6.552ms2026-08-22 20:42:28
why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded

this would take GAGWNSREYQYGNMWWBQWWXYVVLLSS66VX5BBKKNPTINWDMDORIBSAGXTE to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent

mandateamount_exceeds_cap

op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40

what it was decided fromfingerprints
rule compiled from it
1eba210c6c3d4a30ade47c465a6eefcb808eb2bce6b8502696bed8e47fdfab76
request
a21837152244ba59a306da9feb5df56dc381abed5d4da769ec60e08a3db55657
transaction
f265e49a01fdf387e6f1376beb68078500bdb20c1df338d677e66d55a1eacdc4
computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 18469
recomputing…
the chainentry 18469
sealed to the entry before
a85d4050f00ccd774dd6fdcb12b6168525bfad793ece60385746a3cad93dcb1a
this leaf
f039880a71290314b27b67b1528feb5034e6e44acb020dcf2e1db343ba372c5d
signed by
GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
signature
lk1gwXmY6GUIUjA42iVdW6hXohtE4bIvB1sMlOwl+LFxNvwHetuctalMIj8ZwTHUSUkgdNCvkEgaZV1LuP+dDg==