livelog 47,273 entries · root 0adf11636956 · read 02:25:59
the record/entry 46183
DENY
refused before it reached the network
this would take GBFZW5YUF2TXBYQCJI2YOV6G5QX4M7L75WLKDSIMBPSH3XSVPEVOSIHK to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
decided in 6.722ms2026-09-13 06:20:08
why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded

this would take GBFZW5YUF2TXBYQCJI2YOV6G5QX4M7L75WLKDSIMBPSH3XSVPEVOSIHK to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent

mandateamount_exceeds_cap

op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40

what it was decided fromfingerprints
rule compiled from it
8f86d21084783cea8345ad9c3a978de72b17b5296dd13d7ea4beff744f489b43
request
50a5bec306090c3ed1542809ae398274c7894a9f0b19c292188aa241c7620283
transaction
e54e2fa5145cc24d5d9a6041ef4d89a5f250b8232bfe92bfeebf40dd73302f3d
computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 46183
recomputing…
the chainentry 46183
sealed to the entry before
62a3c2099909ae118201160f49761f83b5dc1e112d60309ff0f835702a3014fc
this leaf
f07f488ab60b150c08962ce5f5f6f2bfcb65831073763c4336db2dcf55f7b114
signed by
GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
signature
cs0WrCbglco6x0qDlDo0uFt8/wS13Qj2qJP1BtZ4VnvK5SSAJmf7RjqQPfDlERWn2vmy3vJgLYym80HDdQ9EAg==