why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GC36ZMSPJVCB4SSTUWMANZXV4FJA7W6HHZQDPPZDD6SJLJEZWB3NDIO4 to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 99ff7fa59a2d4e63a2ea8481897732c1566cd39b868313213e998079b2d4d654
- request
- 47c36f74fb33cd67aa64cc54fb5eb84470166548b67eddce5507169274b67853
- transaction
- d500d89532b2f1ab8dd5beef6e5729dd653f53d092c0b6ac72cde57b7c53df75computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 5430
the chainentry 5430
- sealed to the entry before
- cd062cf632f2c295b62af5a4436222ca10cd6f7df998b67be5e13fa33e5b92cc
- this leaf
- f1394811d81e5f58b09c9511b7881bcf4471af94fdcab3262cdf9fd072ac6ccb
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- TPBrhEnMImJTNvPhZ97Sk6qLuPAKsLXhzgnkP21lsqqLWg82H5HjQp/mAxYwOw5fH+awd7zYXvdv3sIw+S2NBg==