why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GBZR3RPHP3E4FM5DDTZ6FJ3VMGOXX2KGBXDVXKSOE7WSWS75UIUX4IB6 to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- d39ed94a668340af6ebb229e1e29fe66bf8dd3c382d98fa1b9c4f36da539a894
- request
- 20eb80f4153a09f80ccccc456a66626b094a61048ffd705c9e30f0c245130431
- transaction
- ae8c11e98019754075ecb5c5f0c4c18b3f9fa62cdcbcacd9832cf9b42878585fcomputed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 3393
the chainentry 3393
- sealed to the entry before
- fcfcdf7f4c9abc904fe8b7d32e8149146cd00fded178bb50f233d301c4315f0a
- this leaf
- f17798dff6441863717799fa785799dc8dd2e8fb52464ccec1ab0e640d2f3719
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- IqS3TdDoLANoy/lXxZ4SNbXYpo53oegJQd0wPl1JY7zmL/Y0EsIpuJl697tAh4WENTD6mf9G4VieJRQLeVffBQ==