livelog 47,375 entries · root 49476d86f010 · read 04:20:43
the record/entry 46424
DENY
refused before it reached the network
this would take GCYUHERJGEVSMUADZZAMQVL5P5IXDROVIGAHPGJJHS6A35USHCNDPXJE to 108 over the last 60000ms, above the 90 window cap, with 78 already spent
decided in 6.815ms2026-09-13 10:45:22
why1 reason
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded

this would take GCYUHERJGEVSMUADZZAMQVL5P5IXDROVIGAHPGJJHS6A35USHCNDPXJE to 108 over the last 60000ms, above the 90 window cap, with 78 already spent

what it was decided fromfingerprints
rule compiled from it
bde76d78ca4c9414370b9b0cc23dedbf5b0827a9ec1bb63ac48cafa19d170e4b
request
b495ce957b4766f666f4767b23cf8de40c6a24bd4070ede697c7e0525466d98b
transaction
b6e0a11bb45eda7921e75a90da8b3c28943bbeb1d3f46f47b8451ac9e29c7dca
computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 46424
recomputing…
the chainentry 46424
sealed to the entry before
bd9e3d7b68de55a9fa7a3e20452f8a933b418e263c9c60d78bfac2cb26721f63
this leaf
f2104e7f3a87181c8c9e17f575ec17cfdff68b926266b33907ec3510df83e6f6
signed by
GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
signature
1FeyeB1kHt13IsJco8SlWK+f3UPpoo7OFiPkapA4T+v9rlGOpSMmsyB59NpRrxHXVfE9iNFqz40PBrIrgT2TDA==