why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GDWYQXCP3RDZJ27PIA63KELQ3KRO7NVTXDJW7YY7IMLXC5Y2VVE45RHO to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- fd10009b1c927febc7750a0008eaf0cd99c08c98528660f42fdc4e64b2853639
- request
- c2933bd7cfd6591f79b85bf957d30f0b7b119da108f520df7f1046f7b1b79a92
- transaction
- a4536a95665998d5053d47a7e2821be67c0f9175a3326953b36e591a5e36ba8ecomputed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 40769
the chainentry 40769
- sealed to the entry before
- 4d3374a1f5f52cf8b9fd7287b1d5c752e6bff4c6f75b496e5f2492388e369b00
- this leaf
- f25ba57589d610fb08cc784b761c82f6c29f01d6265e55aa04ba5bcbd25c914a
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- 0bc8/T51wN8Vpe/KnsQDmHSTxgCvaka4MFUE7MXZ8J3AtwplzuB89ApzGfzsTDsx8JMHFUMDsT2yFmidI51dCg==