why2 reasons
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GA65IEKQHFOLU735D2DT7C3Z454L34WEVZFHIWI7WY4WW7LFLROPR5O3, which is not in the allowlist
counterpartycounterparty_denied
GA65IEKQHFOLU735D2DT7C3Z454L34WEVZFHIWI7WY4WW7LFLROPR5O3 is on the screening list: you placed this account on the screening list for this run
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- a0d5e801ae99d931b52cadf0ec34c8fb90d19cc6a052cf094fd46e61b034fce2
- request
- 7412960cf84f510fbc3a80b74f0111ba273b5ab46c2f06a12b9d33cc8c3b563d
- transaction
- 45c87dadfb00a454283d03f4a535080218d398e33f7e40718e5643f8e77be46ecomputed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 63817
the chainentry 63817
- sealed to the entry before
- b7b31026a20b4ef709372bcda87e2bf9ea617da047f0c3fada37af5e8a1623b2
- this leaf
- f2f0eeda1588600c6299a97bd48afcc93b5837924714fa0a9431637ccfb981d9
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- vPNymUkHfpUsxkRB9UR0CIreJgl7+UxxVFrwtw+mpCa7YBQrh2jbzbt7hqwhN4nlFGfZHeT5syhPl1gs5fCTDA==