livelog 11,198 entries · root 80333e9f9673 · read 04:52:46
the record/entry 7127
DENY
refused before it reached the network
this would take GDMFM5NAOSHGDDUQJLDN477NHBLD6CMG5EHVJ3DJU4IYXJEEF6AVFCHX to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
decided in 5.319ms2026-08-14 00:37:23
why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded

this would take GDMFM5NAOSHGDDUQJLDN477NHBLD6CMG5EHVJ3DJU4IYXJEEF6AVFCHX to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent

mandateamount_exceeds_cap

op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40

what it was decided fromfingerprints
rule compiled from it
da1aa2717652478eb9f829b08fc556fe5c17af969704be8cfa274703e4b0d261
request
0e572821f408799d56ab1815b581811da8994a9a8e7638406a03adebb5900c0f
transaction
2fecc7184aaa653e23d822a07d94d96eabbb9498413c6410e1cdd7f19e916a2e
computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 7127
recomputing…
the chainentry 7127
sealed to the entry before
dbdfa218cdba865a5ac86dac3acbd3c9d4acf1530f4947d77126677053633959
this leaf
f355129f2f4a42bead669a1fb3b29dc2a822f091d3631a3315f3452146dd5567
signed by
GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
signature
mKtS3PtUfnoZ0riV7fBKCno1uL7sfuBo+O1U+pWVsFCkH1hWiuaIEwnBSVoMPXzDdwRivAvYj/8//j8k4xIpCQ==