why2 reasons
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GAIPODRWN6PHKAKOPTT6TB4KLWE3A4OOP3NYHU7AFPKE4IYLN7NZEXVR, which is not in the allowlist
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 580.0000000, cap is 500
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- b9dd98dc4495e239e5d941fbe0c8ce647a02d231281932aca6f465c98d4f620a
- request
- 01b681eb79de75d3faa5d185a4038c5b3d37af366100d722f3e0ed875f010e1b
- transaction
- bdc28c7e31b3a29e60899dfeaaa769fbfab6450c09dfc575fa7178fe51c24071computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 50081
the chainentry 50081
- sealed to the entry before
- 303b4dc5bf1436b85ce91474a4772c03520182b7cb0b63f208f45dc339f00db6
- this leaf
- f4129d70c99895d6642d11e0663c814f64cd0a4569b73ffc1f2e6202265c246b
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- M5+sE37rnVy8/Gfm3QdBbpVoYfgt8rbdupPDE8aZlv0CA6rsuLRaD9U8YlnZYTiBg+d2QpBUAq+pS36lPDsPCw==