why2 reasons
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GAT7M72CTCTEW3JL2QTZHMK5IVWETW3PD7SV4C52AHVG2QJI7SIYDSII, which is not in the allowlist
counterpartycounterparty_denied
GAT7M72CTCTEW3JL2QTZHMK5IVWETW3PD7SV4C52AHVG2QJI7SIYDSII is on the screening list: you placed this account on the screening list for this run
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- dfadf57383ffb3ba2bb17c5a6ae6a4d4344f26bc894f9c6f2b612496eedbd3a3
- request
- d3faeb19824a4618a1084a5f2ea0cbab9e883e379483ed343cb2b16f49973541
- transaction
- dc9c9b28959f5cb3b4fdca29b9933613f618027594e1b36c514870c5d652bd17computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 20768
the chainentry 20768
- sealed to the entry before
- 92932673d7491ea7018c75ed1942cbb5830aa7bfeaac692ff9063e99cdad2f82
- this leaf
- f431076430786a1567b49b8355bb7b62486473201ee4a53b52a25d3bbd7fc425
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- XwYIBehxGgtYWJCwAitRg0Z58T16WgzYryNG8mU+4+1rTmtuQU8KQi9ze/H7jSBrM0EljidzEKqH8rVc5ZLHCg==